SEO·AEO·GEO

Authority 8 min read

How to Get AI to Say Good Things About Your Business (Without Gaming It)

Assistants don’t have opinions about you. They have a summary of other people’s. Change what people say and the summary follows; try to fake it and the summary usually gets worse.

Aalhad, Founder, SEO·AEO·GEO

Founder, SEO·AEO·GEO

Builds SEO·AEO·GEO and writes the crawler, schema, and citation research published here.

𝕏 Post LinkedIn
Abstract observatory of signals, standing for what the web says about a business.

Key takeaways

  • Assistants describe you by summarising reviews, articles, forum threads and your own pages. The tone of the answer is the tone of those sources.
  • Find the recurring complaint behind a negative answer, fix it in the business, and say so publicly. That changes what new reviews say.
  • Reply to reviews, especially critical ones; replies sit next to the complaint and get read with it.
  • Specific proof beats praise. Self-superlatives can count against you: in one test of 100 B2B queries, 69% of the self-promotional “best” lists AI Overviews cited belonged to brands the answer didn’t recommend.
  • Never suppress or fake reviews. The FTC’s 2024 rule bans both, and Google bans selective asking for reviews.

Does your own site have this problem? Check one page.

Free score in about 20 seconds. No sign-in for your first site.

To get AI to say good things about your business, change what its sources say: fix the recurring complaint behind any negative point, reply to reviews (critical ones first), collect a steady flow of recent genuine reviews, and give the web specific proof of what you do well, in your own pages and in coverage by others. Assistants summarise the reviews, threads, articles and pages they read. They don’t form an opinion of their own, so there is no setting to change, and attempts to fake the inputs tend to be caught.

Where the tone of an AI answer comes from

SourceWhat it contributesHow much you control it
Reviews (Google, Yelp, Trustpilot, G2, Tripadvisor…)The recurring praise and complaints, often quoted almost word for wordIndirectly: by running the business well and asking every customer
Forum threads (Reddit and industry forums)First-hand stories, comparisons, warningsVery little; you can take part honestly and reply
News and trade coverageCredibility, or a lasting negative storyPartly: through real news and corrections
Comparison pages and “best of” listsHow you rank against named competitors, and for whomPartly: through outreach and correction requests
Your own siteThe facts you state, if the crawlers can read themFully, but it’s weighed against everything else

Gemini in Google Maps makes the mechanism explicit: Ask Maps builds its recommendations from more than 300 million places and reviews from more than 500 million contributors (AP, March 2026). What reviewers say about your place is the material it works with.

Step 1: find the theme behind the negative answer

  1. Ask the assistants “Is [business] any good?”, “What do reviews say about [business]?” and “[business] vs [competitor]”, three times each, with search on.
  2. Write down every negative point and the source it cites.
  3. Read your last 50 reviews and tag the complaints. In most businesses, two or three themes account for most of the negative ones: wait times, communication, a pricing surprise, one product.

If the negative point traces to something that’s no longer true (an old owner, a fixed problem, a closed location), it’s a wrong-information problem; follow how to fix wrong AI information. If it’s still true, the fix is in the business, not in the marketing.

Step 2: fix it, then say so

Fixing the complaint changes what the next reviews say, and recency matters: in BrightLocal’s 2026 survey, 74% of consumers look only at reviews from the last three months, and Ahrefs found AI assistants cite newer content than Google’s organic results do (vendor study). Then make the fix visible: mention it in replies to the reviews that raised it, add it to the relevant page (“same-day callbacks since March”), and tell the customers who complained, some of whom will update their reviews.

Step 3: reply to reviews like someone will quote you

They might. A reply sits next to the review it answers and is read with it, by people and by the systems that summarise. 89% of consumers expect owners to respond (BrightLocal). Good replies are short, specific and calm: thank them, acknowledge the actual problem, say what you changed or how to reach you, and stop. Never argue, never reveal a customer’s private details, never offer a reward for changing a review.

Step 4: publish proof, not praise

Assistants drop adjectives and keep facts. “Award-winning, best-in-class service” gives them nothing; “4.8 stars from 1,200 Google reviews, 94% of jobs finished on the first visit, Gas Safe registered since 2011” gives them a sentence to repeat. Self-praise can even work against you: Lily Ray’s analysis of Ahrefs Brand Radar data covered 100 B2B queries: 69% of the self-promotional “best” lists Google’s AI Overviews cited (224 of 323) belonged to brands the answer didn’t recommend. In the AutoGEO research (ICLR 2026), simulated AI engines preferred specific, neutral, current content; those were small test engines, not production assistants, so read it as a direction rather than a measured effect.

  • Case studies with numbers, named clients (with permission) and dates.
  • Credentials, registrations and memberships, with links to the issuing body.
  • Awards and coverage from independent sources, linked.
  • Published prices and policies, so assistants don’t fill the gap with complaints about surprises.

Step 5: get good things said by others

Praise on your own site is a claim; praise elsewhere is evidence. Ask every satisfied customer for a review (how to, within the rules), pitch the lists that cover your category (best-of list outreach), and take part honestly where your customers talk (Reddit and AI search). Google’s guide is direct about shortcuts: “seeking inauthentic ‘mentions’ across the web isn’t as helpful as it might seem”.

What never to do

  • Fake reviews, bought reviews or staff posing as customers. The FTC’s 2024 rule bans them, including AI-generated ones, and allows civil penalties.
  • Suppressing genuine negative reviews through threats or intimidation, which the same rule bans.
  • Asking only happy customers for reviews. Google’s policy prohibits selectively soliciting positive reviews.
  • Planting “independent” comparison pages or forum posts. Moderators and platforms look for exactly that, and being caught is the kind of story assistants repeat for years.

Measure the change

Keep the same three questions and re-ask them monthly. Track two things: how many negative points each answer contains, and whether the sources behind them are older or newer than your fix. The question set and scoring sheet are in what AI says about your business.

FAQ

Why does ChatGPT say negative things about my business?+

Because the sources it read say them: reviews, complaint threads, news articles or comparison pages. Ask the same question with search on and look at the citations; the negative point usually traces to one or two recurring themes. If there are no citations, it’s summarising what it learned in training, which reflects the web from months ago.

Can I make ChatGPT stop mentioning a bad review?+

Not directly. You can reply to the review, fix the issue it describes, ask the reviewer to update it if you resolved their problem, and build up newer reviews that reflect the fixed experience. Assistants weight what they find, and recent sources tend to carry more weight in AI answers.

Does positive language on my website make AI describe me positively?+

Not much, and it can backfire. Assistants summarise, so adjectives get dropped and claims get checked against other sources. Specific, verifiable facts (prices, results, credentials, numbers) survive summarising and give an assistant something concrete to say.

Is it legal to remove negative reviews?+

You can report reviews that break a platform’s rules, such as fake or off-topic ones. You can’t suppress genuine negative reviews through threats or intimidation; in the US the FTC’s 2024 rule bans that, and Google’s policy bans discouraging negative reviews or asking only happy customers.

Sources

  1. Why calling yourself “the best” could cost you AI recommendations (Ahrefs Brand Radar data) — Lily Ray (2026-06-17)
  2. AutoGEO: automatically learning generative engine preferences (ICLR 2026; simulated engines) — arXiv
  3. Local Consumer Review Survey 2026 — BrightLocal (2026-02-11)
  4. Do AI assistants prefer to cite fresh content? (17M citations) — vendor study — Ahrefs (2025-07-28)
  5. Maps user-contributed content policy: prohibited and restricted content — Google Maps Help
  6. Federal Trade Commission announces final rule banning fake reviews and testimonials — US Federal Trade Commission (2024-08-14)
  7. Google unveils major changes to its Maps app (AP) — WNEM (2026-03-12)
  8. Optimizing your website for generative AI features on Google Search — Google Search Central (2026-07-10)

Run it on your domain

See this lens as a finding, not a lecture.

Free technical GEO audit. Evidence-traced scores and an LLM-ready export. See your score with no login.

Audit your website

Continue the atlas